labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority in the parent department on the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he has become acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it is perfectly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted within the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all upcoming click here purposes. The aforesaid proposition is set at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.
The recent amendment to Section 489-File from the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the regulation with contemporary challenges.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment with the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to generally be constructed.
The Court thought of the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were including to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.
Knowledge with the accused can be a matter being inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging to get proved otherwise.”
In certain jurisdictions, case regulation is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same type of case.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) with the Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction to your Supreme Court to just take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.